Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood, which opened to mixed reviews in American movie theaters on May 14, is an excellent educational film for current and future conservative American politicians. It reinforces the importance of championing limited government, individual rights, and freedom over the pursuit of self interest.
If you haven’t yet seen the film, this may confuse you. The countless versions of Robin Hood, from 1938’s Errol Flynn in The Adventures of Robin Hood onward, portrayed the medieval hero as a liberal. Robin always had the right talking points, but his main activities were the pursuit of his own interests and the redistribution of wealth. He pursued merriment with Lady Marian and his merry men. He fought for his beloved but absent King Richard the Lionheart and to recover his lost estates. And he taunted the Sheriff of Nottingham for entertainment. Most important, he took from the rich to give to the poor—a defining liberal characteristic.
Read the full column
Filed under: Movies-TV, Satire, Adventures of Robyn Hood, baron, Cate Blanchett, conservative politician, educational film, Errol Flynn, fiefdom, France, freedom, French, individual rights, King John, King Richard the Lionheart, Lady Marian, limited government, Loxley, Magna Carta, rapping and pilllaging, resistribution of wealth, Ridley Scott, Robin Hood, Russell Crowe, self interest, Sheriff of Nottingham, Third Crusade, yoeman archer